AMERICAN LEFTISTS

Has anyone else noticed how these leftist anti-war protesters always use violence (such as the bomb they threw in a military recruiting center in Time Square)? Being a logical being, it makes me wonder who they are really working for.

Leftists always do the thing they are protesting against. For instance, they burn down homes because they aren't built with "green" materials. Isn't smoke from a fire bad for the environment too, or burning trees and grass?

They protest war because it is violent (or so they say that is their reason) but throw bombs at military recruiting centers (or human feces), and root for Al Qaeda and the Taliban even though Al Qaeda purposefully use children, women and mentally retarded people to fight their war. They cut off the heads of their captives and slaughter anyone who dares to protest their actions. But somehow our military is worse than they are.

They celebrate countries like Cuba and Venezuela where the kinds of protests leftists participate in here would get them killed or imprisoned, but they criticize the country that allows them to spout their stupidity with no more punishment than looking ignorant on TV.

They protest when Americans use their pocketbooks to punish leftist propaganda (this is blacklisting), yet seek repeatedly to silence conservative voices. There is a reason that The View has four liberals to one conservative. Leftists cannot let conservatives have equal time. With four women supporting a liberal view, they are making it appear like the conservative view is outside the "main stream" and they are hoping their audience is susceptible to the subtle propaganda of numbers (in other words we'll go with whoever we think has the popular ideas).

In news stories (both print and television) reporters represent the liberal view as the correct view, while using emotive words like far-right, neo-conservative, extremist, fascist, or right-wing to describe conservative views. A Republican who bucks his party is a "Maverick". A Democrat who bucks his party is ridiculed and marginalized by the media (ex. Zell Miller). Conservatives are never given equal time and equal opportunity to argue different sides of an issue. The assumption is nearly always that the liberal viewpoint is correct and they try to convince the viewer that because they have more people supporting the liberal viewpoint than they do supporting the conservative viewpoint, the liberal viewpoint must be correct. They assume that we all want to be on the side of the majority.

In Hollywood, you need only watch the Oscars or the Academy Awards to see that the liberal viewpoint dominates the movie industry. Year after year they put out propaganda films like Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11, Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth, or George Clooney's Good Night, and Good Luck. These movies are rolled out in the hopes of convincing politically illiterate Americans to join them in their leftist views.

When a conservative viewpoint is displayed in a movie (such as Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ), the director has to fund the movie himself because no leftist producer or movie studio will touch it. Indeed, the movie was viciously attacked in the media as being anti-semitic (anything Christian is by default anti-Jewish according to the media, despite the fact that Christians are the biggest supporters of Israel). Its okay for liberals to prevent conservatives from making movies, or from expressing their views, but liberals want carte blanche to spout whatever idiocy they wish to spew out without paying a price for it in their wallet.

Global warming is another example. Al Gore has said that the issue is decided science and therefore anyone who disagrees is an extremist and should not be given a microphone to argue the facts. He associates global warming opponents to people who still believe the earth is flat. Of course, Al Gore is becoming extremely wealthy flying all over the world in private jets (hey aren't those bad for the environment?) talking about global warming and then selling carbon credits to the convenient idiots who buy into his hype.

I say "What are you afraid of"? Why is it so hard for you to argue ideas without trying to marginalize your opponent? I relish having equal footing to argue ideas with liberals. Why do they feel conservatives should just be silenced? Why not prove that your ideas are better by arguing fairly? Could it be that you don't really believe your own ideas are valid? Could it be that you are afraid people will like conservatism over liberalism? Well, infinitus est numerus stultorum (infinite is the number of fools)…but conservatives will not join them.